The Analysis Comparison functionality is now redesigned and moved to the Project Dashboard, offering a more intuitive and accessible way to track project progress over time. This enhancement helps users monitor validation changes across multiple analyses and gain insights into key trends, discrepancies, and file updates — all from a centralized view.
Purpose
The Analysis Comparison feature provides a visual and data-driven comparison between each analysis performed within a project. By highlighting changes between analyses, it enables users to:
- Identify differences between analyses
- Track improvements or regressions in data quality
Key Components
1. File Outcome
The File Outcome section displays all project files, with a breakdown of each file outcome, and distinguishes between:
- Files fully processed for validation (including checks)
- Files that are parsed only (for projects without validation scope)
For each file, the outcome is grouped and color-coded to reflect its outcome status (e.g., Verified, Failed, Suspected). This view is now available starting from the first analysis, helping users establish a baseline and track outcome results across iterations.
2. Discrepancies Trend
Visualizes the evolution of discrepancies identified by Verify over time, by presenting two key trends:
- Total Number of Discrepancies per Analysis – Tracks the number of discrepancies identified in each analysis, enabling teams to measure quality improvements or detect systemic issues.
- Average Number of Discrepancies per Check – Normalizes discrepancy volume by the number of checks, offering a clearer understanding of issue density.
These trends help teams evaluate the effectiveness of their QC processes and allocate resources accordingly.
3. File Modification
The File Modification section highlights files that have been added, removed, or modified between the previous and current analysis. This includes structural changes (e.g., format or content), file name changes, and files with updated validation results.
By isolating modified files, users can quickly focus their attention on new or changing elements that may require revalidation or additional review.
Analysis comparison overview
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.